The primary means of chemical inventory notification and submission is via a federally-developed form, known as a Tier II Chemical Inventory form. The inventory information must be submitted to the fire department having jurisdiction over the facility, the respective county LEPC, and the SERC. In addition to State and local planning requirements, EPCRA Section 312 requires facilities that use or store a hazardous chemical above a threshold quantity to annually submit their chemical inventory information to off-site officials on or before March 1st of each year. SARA Title III, known as the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act (EPCRA), required the development of a State Emergency Response Committee (SERC) as well as Local Emergency Planning Committees (LEPCs) to manage hazardous materials preparedness at the State and county level. In 1986, President Reagan signed into law the Superfund Amendment and Reauthorization Act (SARA) as a revision to federal legislation dealing with hazardous substances and toxic wastes. What is Tier II reporting and who must submit these reports? This link is noted by the red arrow in the slide below.
However, from the Training and Registration web page, local government personnel can go through an on-line tutorial that guides them on how to use the system, search the chemical databases, and use the system in response to an event. AND The district’s description of the progress and challenges faced includes in depth and thorough reflection on prior year strategies that may or may not have contributed (positively or negatively) to district outcomes.It is beyond the scope of this document to include a user guide to navigate from point to point in the program. AND The district’s description of the progress and challenges faced identifies ample and sufficient root causes to explain the reasons for the progress and challenges faced that are within the district’s control to act on, and vary adequately and appropriately based on the district’s data. The district has provided an in depth and thorough description of the progress and challenges faced at the district level for all of the identified prioritized needs. AND The district’s description of the progress and challenges faced includes some reflection on prior year strategies that may or may not have contributed (positively or negatively) to district outcomes. AND The district’s description of the progress and challenges faced identifies some root causes to explain the reasons for the progress and challenges faced that are within the district’s control to act on, and vary appropriately based on the district’s data.
The district has provided a description of the progress and challenges faced at the district level for all of the identified prioritized needs, as applicable. OR The district’s description of the progress and challenges faced includes minimal to no reflection on prior year strategies that may or may not have contributed (positively or negatively) to district outcomes. OR The district’s description of the progress and challenges faced identifies minimal to no root causes to explain the reasons for the progress and challenges faced, or the root causes identified are outside of the district’s control and are therefore not actionable, or the root causes identified contain no variation in accordance with the data. District Plan Rubric Plan Component Data Analysis Needs Improvement Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations The district has provided a description of the progress and challenges faced at the district level for some of the identified prioritized needs, as applicable.